翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ Wilkie
・ Wilkie (electoral district)
・ Wilkie (surname)
・ Wilkie Airport
・ Wilkie Bard
・ Wilkie Clark
・ Wilkie Collins
・ Wilkie Collins bibliography
・ Wilkie Cooper
・ Wilkie D. Ferguson
・ Wilkie D. Ferguson, Jr. (Metromover station)
・ Wilkie investment model
・ Wilkie Rasmussen
・ Wilkie Sugar Loaf
・ Wilkie Sugar Loaf trail
Wilkie v. Robbins
・ Wilkie's theorem
・ Wilkie, Saskatchewan
・ Wilkiea
・ Wilkiea huegeliana
・ Wilkiejmy
・ Wilkieston
・ Wilkin & Sons
・ Wilkin (surname)
・ Wilkin Castillo
・ Wilkin County Courthouse
・ Wilkin County, Minnesota
・ Wilkin Mota
・ Wilkin Ramírez
・ Wilkin River


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

Wilkie v. Robbins : ウィキペディア英語版
Wilkie v. Robbins

''Wilkie v. Robbins'', , was a United States Supreme Court case that concerned the scope of qualified immunity for government officials working in the Bureau of Land Management (BLM). Specifically, the Supreme Court held that BLM employees could not be liable for an alleged retaliation claim against Robbins, a farm owner, because other avenues for relief were available. Though these workers may have been tough in negotiations with Robbins over access over his land, none of that rose to the level of a constitutional violation.
== Background ==
In 1994, Frank Robbins purchased a Wyoming dude ranch which functioned as a commercial guest resort. The original owner of the property had signed an agreement with the BLM granting an easement along a road which crossed the ranch. The Bureau failed to record the easement, and it ceased to exist when the property was transferred to Robbins. Robbins continued to graze cattle in the area, leading to a BLM employee demanding a new easement to replace the old one. At trial, Robbins claimed that employees of the BLM engaged in a "campaign of harassment and intimidation aimed at forcing him to re-grant the lost easement."
In 1998, after a series of further conflicts with BLM officials, Robbins filed a lawsuit. He claimed that the BLM actions violated the RICO statute, a law which bars racketeering. Additionally, he argued that the federal officials violated his Fourth and Fifth Amendment rights.〔
The District Court dismissed all of Robbins' claims on the grounds that there were other alternative means of relief, absent a lawsuit. The Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit reversed, finding that judicial relief was open for "constitutional violations committed by individual federal employees unrelated to final agency action." After a series of proceedings between the District Court and the Court of Appeals, the BLM officials sought review before the Supreme Court.

抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「Wilkie v. Robbins」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.